Energy Tribune- Hey Paul Krugman, Here are 2.4 Billion More Traitors

Posted on Jul. 03, 2009

By Robert Bryce

Hey Paul Krugman, Here are 2.4 Billion More Traitors

Some questions defy answers. Among the most famous of those: “What’s the sound of one hand clapping?” Over the past week, another question has been added to the answer-defying list: “how do you charge 2.4 billion people with treason?”

That query has emerged since last Friday, when the US House of Representative narrowly passed (219-212) the mammoth cap-and-trade legislation which aims to cut US carbon dioxide emissions by 80% by 2050. Two days after the vote, Paul Krugman, a columnist for the New York Times excoriated the 212 members of the House who voted against the legislation, saying that they were “deniers” about the dangers of climate change and that they were committing a “form of treason — treason against the planet.”

Of course, everyone – and columnists in particular -- is entitled to their own measure of hyperbole. But Krugman neglected to inform the Chinese and the Indians – all 2.4 billion of them – that they were committing treason against the planet, too. In the wake of the House vote, government officials from China and India made it clear that they are not going to support the measures put forward in the House bill, particularly the ones that could restrict emissions in developing countries and allow trade sanctions against the countries that don’t comply with those emission limits.

On Tuesday, Indian Environment Minister Jairam Ramesh said that India “will not accept any emission-reduction target, period. This is a non-negotiable stand.” He went on, saying that “there is no way India is going to accept any emission reduction target, period.”

On Thursday, China’s vice foreign minister, He Yafei, told reporters in Beijing that China is “firmly opposed” to any measures that will impose trade penalties on countries that fail to limit their carbon dioxide emissions. “We are firmly against such attempts to advance trade protectionism under the pretext of climate change. It is not conducive to world economic recovery. It serves nobody’s interests.”

Hmmm. So now what? If Krugman is right, then China and India – who together represent 35% of the world’s total population (along with the 212 House members who voted nay) – are committing treason against the planet. If that's true, then where will we hold the trial? Where will we find a courtroom big enough?

As I said, some questions defy answers. And finding an answer to the thorny question of global carbon dioxide emissions may be the most difficult one of all.

Stumble It!

Back Home Back to Top

Related Articles

	Canard a la Recession: The Cap-and-Trade Tax The Cap-and-Trade Delusion Wall Street Extorts Kyoto Protocol: Lehman, Enron and other Cap-and-Tr

Add a Comment:
You must be a member to post comments. Please click here to sign up
Article Comments:
Please correct me if I'm wrong Posted: 07/11/2009 11:03 AM by Jim Olson But is this the same krugman that was an enron advisor?
What would Mother Earth do! Posted: 07/10/2009 05:16 PM by Darryl Saibic All the global warming experts predicting total disaster for the planet. And Mother Earth just goes on chugging along, one blast from one of her volcanoes would set back thesi falacy about climate warming 50 years. When you think that you have more insight than mother raeth we would have to consider you God unless you don't believe then your test would be to make a tree with out using any seeds or seedlings you know from scratch
Toxic CO2 is real Posted: 07/10/2009 02:49 PM by skip hockman It's true, and we need to recognize that B.O. and those other great scientists John Kerry and Prince Charlie, are prescient in noting that toxic CO2 is getting into our water. I was shocked - shocked I say - to be informed that toxic CO2 is even in my beer. And my Coke. And maybe my vodka tonic. I have it on good authority that France is exporting all of the CO2 they can, disguised as Champagne. Why does the EPA not regulate the international trade of CO2. So who is getting payoff to look the other way on this important question? Where is the cavalry to protect us from ourselves?