Safe Nuclear Power Not a Pipedream

From Sidney Morning Herald

THE Chinese are running away with thorium energy, giving an edge to a global race for the prize of clean, cheap and safe nuclear power. Good luck to them. They may do us all a favour.

Jiang Mianheng, son of former leader Jiang Zemin, is spearheading a project for the Chinese Academy of Sciences with a start-up budget of $US350 million. He has already recruited 140 scientists working full time on thorium power at the Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics. He will have 750 staff by 2015.

The aim is to break free of the old pressurised-water reactors fuelled by uranium – originally designed for US submarines in the 1950s – in favour of thorium reactors that produce far less toxic waste and cannot blow their tops like Fukushima.

”China is the country to watch,” said Bryony Worthington, head of Britain’s All-Party Parliamentary Group on Thorium Energy, who visited the Shanghai operations recently.

”They are really going for it, and have talented researchers. This could lead to a massive break-through.”

The thorium story is by now well known. Enthusiasts believe it could be the transforming technology needed to drive the industrial revolutions of Asia – and to avoid an almighty energy crunch as 2 billion more people climb the ladder to Western lifestyles.

At the least, it could do for nuclear power what shale fracking has done for natural gas – but on a bigger scale, for much longer, perhaps more cheaply, and with near zero carbon dioxide emissions.

The Chinese are leading the charge, but they are not alone. Norway’s Thor Energy began a four-year test last month with Japan’s Toshiba-Westinghouse to test whether they could use thorium at Norway’s conventional Halden reactor near Oslo.

The Japanese are keen to go further, knowing they have to come up with something radically new to regain public trust and save their nuclear industry.

Japan’s International Institute for Advanced Studies – now led by thorium enthusiast Takashi Kamei – is researching molten salt reactors that use liquid fuel.

Technology for the molten salt process already exists. The Oak Ridge National Laboratory in Tennessee built such a reactor in the 1960s. It was shelved by the Nixon administration. The Pentagon needed plutonium residue from uranium to build nuclear bombs. The imperatives of the Cold War prevailed.

The thorium blueprints gathered dust in the archives until retrieved and published by former NASA engineer Kirk Sorensen. The US largely ignored him: China did not.

Mr Jiang visited the Oak Ridge labs and obtained the designs after reading an article in American Scientist two years ago extolling thorium. His team concluded that a molten salt reactor could answer China’s prayers.

Mr Jiang says China’s energy shortage is becoming ”scary” and will soon pose a threat to national security. It is no secret what he means. Escalating disputes with India, Vietnam, the Philippines and Japan are quickly becoming the biggest threats to world peace.

The Shanghai team plans to build a tiny two-megawatt plant using liquid fluoride fuel by the end of the decade, before scaling up to commercially viable size in the 2020s. It is also working on a pebble-bed reactor. Mr Jiang estimates that China has enough thorium to power its electricity needs for 20,000 years. So does the world. The radioactive mineral is scattered across Britain. The Americans have buried tonnes of it, a hazardous byproduct of rare-earth metal mining.

China will have 26 new conventional reactors by 2015. A further 51 are planned, and 120 more are in the pipeline. But these have all the known drawbacks, and rely on imported uranium.

The beauty of thorium is that you cannot have a Fukushima disaster. Professor Robert Cywinski from Huddersfield University, who anchors Britain’s thorium research network, ThorEA, said the metal must be bombarded with neutrons to drive the process. ”There is no chain reaction. Fission dies the moment you switch off the photon beam,” he said.

Click here to read more

Add Comment

By posting your comment, you agree to abide by our Posting rules


Comments (2)

© 2013 Energy Tribune

Scroll to top