US Shale and Iraqi Oil are Changing the Energy Game
From The Australian
By Robert Gottliebsen
APART from Tony Abbott and Joe Hockey, almost everyone is going around congratulating Wayne Swan on forgetting about the surplus.
But as a nation, we are forgetting why Swan is under so much pressure. The short-term back-slapping conceals a situation that has great long-term danger.
For almost a decade, both sides of politics have been spending the proceeds of the mineral boom as though it was a permanent change. The Treasurer took the process much further than Peter Costello but this was a policy that had underlying support from both parties.
We all thought that we were safe as long as China maintained momentum and we concluded that China had to maintain momentum or it would suffer severe social consequences.
We are now seeing China move forward again and so we feel good and markets are rising. Nevertheless there are underlying problems with China, but we will leave them for another day.
The medium-term threat to Australia is not China or even Europe (unless there is a meltdown), but rather comes from the US and the Middle East. The mining boom was about two export products: iron ore and energy (gas and coal). Iron ore’s supply has not ballooned and its outlook remains tied to the old China-based paradigm. No need for alarm at this stage.
But the energy scene is totally different. After a few disappointing wells, Saudi hit oil in 1938 and the discovery changed the postwar world. Now in the space of little more than two years we have effectively made two Saudi discoveries: one in the US via shale and the other in Iraq (George Bush was told big oil was in Iraq).
By posting your comment, you agree to abide by our Posting rules